LAW OFFICE OF D.L. DRAIN

1702 W. Camelback, Suite 264

 Phoenix, AZ 85015

Phone: 602.246.7106

Fax: 602.249.1969

DDrain@DianeDrain.com

 
   


   
 

 

BANKRUPTCY CASE LAW:
LEASES, OPTIONS, LEASE-BACK & EQUITABLE MORTGAGE

The following is for the exclusive use of attorneys.  This firm does not make any representations as to the accuracy or current status of any case cited herein. 



 

 


POST BAPCPA:
In re McCray, 342 B.R. 668 (Bkrtcy.D.Dist.Colo. 2006)  S. MARTIN TEEL, JR., Bankruptcy Judge NEWLY ENACTED PROVISIONS OF § 362(b)(22) PREVENTING STAY OF EVICTION FROM ARISING IN SERIAL FILING CASE REQUIRES A LEASE OR RENTAL AGREEMENT

NEWLY ENACTED PROVISIONS OF § 362(d)(4) GIVING COURT POWER TO GRANT RELIEF FROM STAY FOR TWO YEARS IN ANY SUBSEQUENT CASE REQUIRES THE CREDITOR TO HOLD A SECURITY INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY

The debtors had filed several petitions to frustrate eviction by an owner who had newly acquired the property in a foreclosure. The court held that there was no lease or rental agreement, nor did the owner have a "security interest" per se because by acquiring ownership its security interest was extinguished, and accordingly new BAPCPA provisions of § 362 did not apply. Nevertheless the court ruled that it had the power under § 105(a) to terminate the stay and issue order preventing stay from arising in any case filed within the next 2 years.

WARNING: PRE-BAPCPA
An automobile sale/lease-back/option-to-buy agreement that meets Merryweather v. Pendleton test is a security device for a loan and subject to Consumer Lenders Act; latter act is not void for vagueness.  SAL Leasing, Inc. v Arizona, 1 CA-CV 99-0631, 10/3/00.

A lender who takes title, then allowing old owner to reside in property under premise of a lease to purchase; Arizona Question regarding Equitable Mortgages  There is a good discussion of "disguised real estate security transactions" in Nelson and Whitman's hornbook on Real Estate Financing, Chapter 3, and an old law review article by Cunningham and Tischler in 26 Rutgers Law Review 1 (1972).

PACIFIC SHORES v. AT HOME CORP., No. 03-15769 (9th Cir. December 28, 2004)   A bankruptcy court may approve retroactively the rejection of an unexpired nonresidential lease.  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0315769p.pdf

  BACK TO BANKRUPTCY CASE LAW Index


OPINION SUMMARIES ARCHIVE FindLaw archives case law summaries of opinion issued since September 2000 by the U.S. Supreme Court, all thirteen Federal Circuit Courts, the California Supreme Court, the California Appellate Courts, and the New York Court of Appeals.  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casesummary/index.html

goldbreak.JPG    Arizona Exemptions    goldbreak.JPG
 

DISCLAIMER This site is not intended to be advertising and the Law Office of D.L. Drain, P.A. and the attorneys employed by that firm do not seek to represent anyone in a state where this site may fail to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.  The information provided in this web site is for general information purposes only. All the documents, forms and information on these web pages are generic in nature and must not be regarded as legal advice. The law changes periodically and we make no representations that any of the information is accurate. You are not to make any inference from this website that our firm represents you or would be able to represent you; or that the information contained herein applies to your specific circumstances. You must seek legal counsel to ascertain your rights and obligations.

 

 

Copyright © 1997-2007, Law Office of D.L. Drain, P.A.
Designed by The Legal Resource Group, Inc. & IMT Zone, Inc.

Viewing the information on this site is not intended to constitute legal advice or to create any attorney-client relationship.
Please read
our disclaimer and additional copyright notices

 Your ALT-Text here