LAW OFFICE OF D.L. DRAIN

1702 W. Camelback, Suite 264

 Phoenix, AZ 85015

Phone: 602.246.7106

Fax: 602.249.1969

DDrain@DianeDrain.com

 
   


   
 

 

BANKRUPTCY CASE LAW:
PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT

The following is for the exclusive use of attorneys.  This firm does not make any representations as to the accuracy or current status of any case cited herein. 



 

 


In re Hessco Industries, Inc.9th Cir. BAP 2003  ORDINARY COURSE DEFENSE AGAINST PREFERENCE ACTION REQUIRES EVIDENCE OF PREVAILING BUSINESS STANDARD
Court reverses the bankruptcy court's conclusion that the ordinary course of business defense precluded judgment for the Trustee on the preference cause of action because appellees had failed to present evidence of prevailing business standards as required under Sulmeyer v. Suzuki (In re Grand Chevrolet, Inc.), 25 F.3d 728, 732 (9th Cir. 1994).

But the court recited with approval remarks from Ganis Credit Corp. v. Anderson (In re Jan Weilert RV, Inc.), 315 F.3d 1192 (9th Cir. 2003), amended by 326 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir. 2003): “[C]reditors are not required to prove a particular uniform set of business terms, rather "ordinary business terms" refers to the broad range of terms that encompasses the practices employed by those debtors and creditors, including terms that are ordinary for those under financial distress. Only a transaction that is so unusual or uncommon "as to render it an aberration in the relevant industry," falls outside the broad range of terms encompassed by the meaning of "ordinary business terms."

BATLAN v. TRANSAMERICA COMMERCIAL FIN. CORP. (09/13/01 - No. 99-35946) (9th Cir. Ct App) Under 11 USC 547(b)(5), a bankruptcy trustee must still prove that a secured creditor received payments in excess of its secured interest during the 90 days before the debtor filed a petition, even if the creditor had a floating lien. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/9935946p.pdf

GANIS CREDIT CORP. v. ANDERSON (01/13/03 - No. 01-55455/56872) (9th Cir Ct Apps)  Under 11 U.S.C. section 547(c)(2)(C), a court cannot limit "ordinary business terms" to the "average" transactions in the industry, but must consider the broad range of terms that encompasses the practices employed by similarly situated debtors and creditors facing the same or similar problems.  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0155455p.pdf

FRANK v. MICHIGAN STATE UNEMPLOYMENT AGENCY (06/06/01 - No. 00-1233)  (6th Cir St App)  Pre-petition liens on the bankruptcy debtor's property do not reattach to post-petition preference proceeds recovered by a bankruptcy trustee because the proceeds are property of the estate to be distributed to the debtor's creditors under the Bankruptcy Code. 

MOREHEAD v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. (05/03/01 - No. 99-6430)  (6th Cir St App) A wage garnishment is an avoidable transfer where the garnishment is of wages earned during the 90-day preference period in bankruptcy under 11 USC 547(b)(4)(A).  http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/6th/01a0143p.html

  BACK TO BANKRUPTCY CASE LAW Index


OPINION SUMMARIES ARCHIVE FindLaw archives case law summaries of opinion issued since September 2000 by the U.S. Supreme Court, all thirteen Federal Circuit Courts, the California Supreme Court, the California Appellate Courts, and the New York Court of Appeals.  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casesummary/index.html

goldbreak.JPG    Arizona Exemptions    goldbreak.JPG
 

DISCLAIMER This site is not intended to be advertising and the Law Office of D.L. Drain, P.A. and the attorneys employed by that firm do not seek to represent anyone in a state where this site may fail to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.  The information provided in this web site is for general information purposes only. All the documents, forms and information on these web pages are generic in nature and must not be regarded as legal advice. The law changes periodically and we make no representations that any of the information is accurate. You are not to make any inference from this website that our firm represents you or would be able to represent you; or that the information contained herein applies to your specific circumstances. You must seek legal counsel to ascertain your rights and obligations.

 

 

Copyright © 1997-2007, Law Office of D.L. Drain, P.A.
Designed by The Legal Resource Group, Inc. & IMT Zone, Inc.

Viewing the information on this site is not intended to constitute legal advice or to create any attorney-client relationship.
Please read
our disclaimer and additional copyright notices

 Your ALT-Text here