LAW OFFICE OF D.L. DRAIN

1702 W. Camelback, Suite 264

 Phoenix, AZ 85015

Phone: 602.246.7106

Fax: 602.249.1969

DDrain@DianeDrain.com

 
   


   
 

 

BANKRUPTCY CASE LAW:
RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS AND BANKRUPTCY

The following is for the exclusive use of attorneys.  This firm does not make any representations as to the accuracy or current status of any case cited herein.   



 


Cunning v. Rucker, No. 08-55652  U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, June 26, 2009 
In an appeal from the Bankruptcy Court's order denying an exemption for Debtor's assets in pension and 401(k) plans, the order is affirmed, where the retirement plans were not designed and used primarily for retirement purposes. 
Facing a civil judgment debt of more than $6.5 million, Lloyd Myles Rucker declared bankruptcy and tried to exempt his assets as belonging to private retirement plans under California Civil Procedure Code (“CPC”) § 704.115. Rucker had previously placed the assets in pension and 401(k) plans funded by his wholly owned corporations. The bankruptcy court denied the exemption on the explicit ground that Rucker’s retirement plans were not designed and used primarily for retirement purposes. The district court reversed, but 9th Circuit upheld bankruptcy court.

In re: SCOTT LEE EGEBJERG, 08-55301, CV-07-6850-PA (9th Circuit 5-09) Debtor challenges dismissal of his Chapter 7 petition for abuse under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(3).  Issue of first instance: does a debtor’s repayment of a 401(k) loan constitutes a “monthly payment on account of secured debts” or an “[o]ther [n]ecessary [e]xpense” that can be deducted from a debtor’s monthly income for purposes of calculating the debtor’s disposable monthly income under § 707(b)(2). We conclude it is not, because Debtor had sufficient means to repay a meaningful portion of his debts, especially once his 401(k) loan was repaid in just over a year, leaving $525 a month to repay unsecured creditors. Therefore, the debtor’s filing in this case was presumptively abusive under the “means test” of § 707(b)(2). Bankruptcy court’s dismissal of Chapter 7 petition affirmed.

 

  BACK TO BANKRUPTCY CASE LAW Index


OPINION SUMMARIES ARCHIVE FindLaw archives case law summaries of opinion issued since September 2000 by the U.S. Supreme Court, all thirteen Federal Circuit Courts, the California Supreme Court, the California Appellate Courts, and the New York Court of Appeals.  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casesummary/index.html

goldbreak.JPG    Arizona Exemptions    goldbreak.JPG
 

DISCLAIMER This site is not intended to be advertising and the Law Office of D.L. Drain, P.A. and the attorneys employed by that firm do not seek to represent anyone in a state where this site may fail to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.  The information provided in this web site is for general information purposes only. All the documents, forms and information on these web pages are generic in nature and must not be regarded as legal advice. The law changes periodically and we make no representations that any of the information is accurate. You are not to make any inference from this website that our firm represents you or would be able to represent you; or that the information contained herein applies to your specific circumstances. You must seek legal counsel to ascertain your rights and obligations.

 

 

Copyright © 1997-2007, Law Office of D.L. Drain, P.A.
Designed by The Legal Resource Group, Inc. & IMT Zone, Inc.

Viewing the information on this site is not intended to constitute legal advice or to create any attorney-client relationship.
Please read
our disclaimer and additional copyright notices

 Your ALT-Text here