Debtors may amend their Schedules at any time -- F.R.Bankr.P
1009 -- but some courts hold that this right is dependent
upon the Debtors' acting in good faith and no other parties
being prejudiced by the late amendment. See, e.g.,
In re Cinelli, Chapter
7, Case No. 05-16962 , UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3432;
In re Price, BANKRUPTCY
CASE NO. 06-62721-MGD , UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION, 2006
Bankr. LEXIS 3247.
KERTESZ v. OSTROVSKY (01/28/04 -
No. G030640, G031373) (California Appellate Districts)
Plaintiffs' complaint, seeking an unpaid judgment, was timely;
the limitations period was tolled by defendant's bankruptcy
petition and by the resulting automatic stay. Judgment of
dismissal is accordingly reversed.
BACK TO BANKRUPTCY CASE LAW
Index
OPINION
SUMMARIES ARCHIVE FindLaw archives case law summaries of
opinion issued since September 2000 by the U.S. Supreme Court,
all thirteen Federal Circuit Courts, the California Supreme
Court, the California Appellate Courts, and the New York Court
of Appeals.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casesummary/index.html
